Tunisian authorities are prosecuting citizens in both military and civilian courts and jailing them for public criticism of President Kais Saied and other officials, Human Rights Watch said today. Those prosecuted include members of parliament, commentators on social media, and a television host.
Using repressive laws enacted prior to the Tunisian revolution, prosecutors are going after those who criticize Saied and who label as a “coup” his seizure of exceptional powers beginning on July 25, 2021. Of the five recent speech cases that Human Rights Watch reviewed, one person is currently serving a prison sentence for insulting the president, among other charges, three are on trial for defaming the army and insulting the president, and one is under criminal investigation on similar accusations.
“To publicly challenge the president and his seizure of special powers is to risk finding yourself in court,” said Eric Goldstein, acting Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “Silencing critics is doubly dangerous at a time when the president is busy concentrating so much power in his own hands.”
Saied has publicly supported, in numerous instances, prosecuting Tunisians who “insult and defame, rather than exercise their right to free speech.”
In the civilian courts, charges include “insulting the president,” under article 67 of the penal code, “accusing public officials of crimes related to their jobs without furnishing proof of guilt” (article 128), and “an attack that seeks to change the form of government or to incite people to take up arms against one another” article 72, which can be punishable by death).
In the military court, charges have been brought for “defaming the army,” under article 91 of Tunisia’s military justice code, known as the Code of Prosecutions and Military Penalties. Criticism of the president risks prosecution as an offense under the military justice code because the president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces under the constitution. The military justice code punishes with up to three years in prison “any person, military or civilian, who denigrates the flag, defames the army, or incites military personnel to disobey or criticize military leaders.”
On July 25, Saied announced that he was dismissing the prime minister, suspending parliament, lifting parliamentary immunity, and imposing other extraordinary measures that he said were necessary to address Tunisia’s months-long political crisis and mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic, which had aggravated a prolonged economic slump. On August 23, Saied extended his extraordinary powers indefinitely. On December 13, he announced plans to hold a national referendum on a revised constitution in July 2022 while keeping parliament shut until elections for a replacement body in December 2022.
The lack of a constitutional court with a mandate to repeal laws that are found unconstitutional, deprives Tunisians of a key safeguard against criminal prosecutions on charges that violate their human rights, Human Rights Watch said. Repressive laws, including those criminalizing criticism of state institutions, have remained in force despite the 2014 Tunisian Constitution’s protection of freedom of speech. There is no functioning higher court that is empowered to order the repeal of these laws.
Police in Kef arrested Selim Jebali, who frequently comments on issues related to politics and social measures, on October 7. Amor Raoueni, Jebali’s lawyer, told Human Rights Watch that the authorities cited three comments from Jebali’s Facebook page posted between July 25 to October 6, in which he described the president as “a dog” and a “coup maker.”
The Kef First Instance Permanent Military Court sentenced Jebali on October 13 to one year in prison for “insulting the president,” “defaming the army,” and “accusing public officials of crimes related to their jobs without furnishing proof of guilt.” An appeals court reduced the sentence to six months on November 13. Jebali is currently serving his sentence in Mornaguia prison in Tunis.
The public prosecutor of the Tunis First Instance Permanent Military Court brought charges against Yassine Ayari, a member of the suspended parliament representing the Hope and Labor movement, for comments on Facebook posted in July that allegedly insulted the president and defamed the army, Ayari told Human Rights Watch. In his posts, he described Saied’s July 25 measures as a “military coup” and said that “Saied has transgressed prerogatives as mandated to him by the constitution,” in reference to Saied’s use of article 80 of the 2014 constitution to justify his seizure of extraordinary powers. Article 80 authorizes the president to take “necessary measures” in case of “an imminent threat” but also circumscribes the measures permitted.
On July 30, after President Saied lifted parliamentary immunity, the authorities arrested Ayari to force him to serve a 2018 prison sentence handed down by a Tunis military court for a Facebook post deemed critical of the president. The authorities released Ayari on September 22, after he had spent two months in Mornaguia Prison in Tunis. The court postponed Ayari’s trial on the new charges from November 22 until February 14, 2022.
Amer Ayed, a television host, and Abdelatif Aloui, a member of parliament from the Al Karama coalition, were arrested separately on October 3, at their homes in Monastir and Tunis respectively, on a charge of defaming the president, their lawyer, Malek ben Amor, told Human Rights Watch. The two had appeared together on the October 1 edition of the weekly Zitouna TV program Hassad 24, which Ayed hosts. During the show, both criticized Saied and called his July 25 measures a coup. Aloui also called Saied “a manipulator,” and criticized senior appointments he had made. Authorities arrested and interrogated both men separately, in the absence of their lawyers.
On October 5, an investigating judge at Tunis First Instance Permanent Military court charged both men with “insulting the president,” “an attack that seeks to change the form of government or to incite people to take up arms against one another,” “accusing public officials of crimes related to their jobs without furnishing proof of guilt,” and “defaming the army.” On October 5, the court placed Ayed in detention while provisionally releasing Aloui. On November 25, the same court released Ayed provisionally and postponed the trial to January 20, 2022.
Officers of the Anti-Criminality Unit of Ben Arous of the National Guard in Ben Arous, interrogated Amina Mansour, a social media commentator, on June 28 about a satirical Facebook post from May describing the president as the “cleanest” and “most uncorrupt president.” A public prosecutor of Tunis First Instance Permanent Military Court interrogated Mansour the same day but did not order her detention.
On July 14, the court ordered Mansour to undergo a psychiatric evaluation but Mansour refused to comply and remains under investigation. “I am currently in a legal limbo,” Mansour told Human Rights Watch. “I don’t know what this situation means, does it mean that if I try to travel for example, police can just stop me and tell me that I have a pending judicial case?”
The revolution in 2010-2011 that ousted President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali brought Tunisians more freedom to criticize the authorities. However, authorities have, since 2012, prosecuted numerous journalists, bloggers, artists, and intellectuals for peacefully criticizing the president and other officials, under penal code provisions on “defamation,” “offenses against state officials,” and “harming public order,” all of which can result in prison terms.
At least nine social media commentators have faced criminal charges since 2017 for criticizing senior public officials. Wajdi Mahouechi, an activist, is serving a two-year prison sentence a Tunis court imposed on him in November 2020 for posting a video of himself criticizing a public prosecutor.
Allowing the prosecution of a civilian before a military tribunal is a violation of the right to a fair trial and due process guarantees, Human Rights Watch said. The Principles on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Aid in Africa note that “the purpose of Military Courts is to determine offenses of a pure military nature committed by pure military personnel.”Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Human Rights Watch (HRW).
© Press Release 2021
Disclaimer: The contents of this press release was provided from an external third party provider. This website is not responsible for, and does not control, such external content. This content is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither this website nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this press release.
The press release is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither this website nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors or inaccuracies in the content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the information within this article is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, this website, its parent company, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and the respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors will not be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, including without limitation, lost profits, lost savings and lost revenues, whether in negligence, tort, contract or any other theory of liability, even if the parties have been advised of the possibility or could have foreseen any such damages.