A year ago, the Indian economy was being projected as a bright spot in the global economic landscape. The aggregate growth rate of 7 to 8 per cent seemed consistent even though domestic private investment levels were low, with a lag in the domestic industrial productivity levels. Over the last year, the strength of India's macroeconomic fundamentals have seen a significant fall (particularly since the implementation of demonetisation and the GST system), pointing at worrying trends for India's capability to sustain a higher level of economic growth (around 7-8 per cent) for the achievement of developmental goals.

In comparative terms, India's growth level at 5.7 per cent ties it with Pakistan and is behind the performance of China and the Philippines. Bangladesh, with a robust manufacturing performance is now growing at an annual rate of 7 per cent. Even if we ignore the statistical significance of GDP-centric growth numbers, India's macroeconomic performance seems inconsistently dawdling in comparison to other emerging countries.

The size of India's domestic market and its contribution to world output over the long run is important for global productivity standards.

At a recent press conference, finance minister Arun Jaitley hinted that the Modi government was planning on a fiscal stimulus package to revive growth. The government must consider some key interventions for reviving India's growth for improved short-term and long-term economic performance.

India's Index of Industrial Production (IIP) was growing by 1.2 per cent in July, compared to 4.5 per cent a year ago. In recent years, demand for consumer durables has been low (falling by 1.3 per cent from last year). India's annual export growth has also gone down to around 3 per cent from the average of 17.8 per cent seen during 2003-2008. The investment to GDP ratio is below 30 per cent today, though it used to be more than 35 per cent over the last decade. The squeeze in access to financial capital for the private sector due to highly stressed banks (with high non-performing assets) is making the aggregate investment scenario worse, posing long-term repercussions for the need of capital accumulation.

For the RBI, it may be a good strategy to lower interest rates further to align its monetary policy with the demand for private investment. An overreliance on foreign institutional investment (FIIs) for capital needs is highly volatile affecting the real exchange rate, making the rupee appreciate while making it less competitive in comparison to other emerging market currencies. Some partial capital account controls to regulate these hot money FII flows can help in promoting inflow of good foreign direct investments.

Moreover, a Keynesian style interventionist strategy to increase the volume and rate of public investments over the long run can help in improving the poor domestic industrial growth performance. In sectors where manufacturing capacities need a stronger push, increase in public investment will be seen as a good measure. This push with the visible hand of the government will boost producer and consumer confidence in the domestic market, similar to how the East Asian economies achieved a highly consistent and sustainable performance in their economic growth levels.

The recent empirical evidence from a 'jobless growth' phase across India poses long-term challenges to the rate of employment of existing labour and those entering the job market in the near future. Public investments in sectors or industrial activities that involve a greater labour intensity may allow opportunities for medium- to low-skilled labor, in turn boosting growth. Capital-intensive growth that lowers employment elasticity should be prevented.

The substitution of capital for labour in organised manufacturing activities (as seen in the case of the automobile industry, for example) endangers existing and new employment opportunities for India's rising labour market. To tackle this, one requires an increase in public and private investments in small and medium industries manufacturing leather products, textiles, apparel, rubber products, electrical equipment, hardware, etc. One can observe two-fold advantages from the nature of such investments: one, this will allow most of the working labour to be absorbed in these industries; second, it will help in expanding the export-potential of these export-oriented primary goods that are higher in consumer demand across countries in South and Southeast Asia.

In terms of public investment, both these sectors have witnessed utmost neglect over the last decade and more. A well-coordinated regulatory approach by state and central governments can help channelise quality investment (including private investment) in higher and primary education along with healthcare, enabling citizens to have access to basic social opportunities at an affordable cost.

Public investments across all industries with a policy focus to balance the female labour force participation rate and the female-male working population ratio can go a long way in improving India's economic growth performance while strengthening its social capital.

- The Wire

Deepanshu Mohan is assistant professor of economics at Jindal School of International Affairs, O.P. Global Jindal University


Copyright 2017 Khaleej Times. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).