|27 May, 2019

Distinction between private and institutional clients is fading

Nicolas Faller has been co-chief executive officer of asset management at Union Bancaire Privée, UBP SA since September 2015. He served as the head of sales of Europe at Union Bancaire Privee, UBP SA from joining in November 2010 to September 2015 and served as its executive managing director from January 2015 to September 2015. Prior to this, he was the global head of distribution sales and member of the executive committee at BNP Paribas Investment Partners. He was the head of marketing at Fortis Investments (France). Mr. Faller was responsible for the global product development initiatives at the firm. He was the head of sales for France, Switzerland, UK and Portugal markets at it between 1998 and 2006. He was a senior sales director at Paribas Asset Management from 1996 to 1998. He was the head of client service, based in London, covering European and Asian institutional clients. He graduated from the Ecole Superieure de Gestion in Paris (major) in 1991.

Website: https://www.ubp.com/en

Private clients are ever more demanding, being better informed, more digitally savvy, and more international

Wealth management professionals have all noticed that every year the line between private and institutional clients is fading and their specific needs, which used to be so different, are becoming increasingly similar. And the trend is not a passing one. With the expectations of the two categories of clients converging towards ever higher standards, private bankers and asset managers have their work cut out to prove the added value of their products and services.

This convergence shows in several ways. Firstly, private clients are ever more demanding, being better informed, more digitally savvy, and more international. This is particularly noticeable in reporting: private clients are no longer satisfied with a standard performance report; they want to identify the sources of their portfolios’ returns with a breakdown by sector, asset class or manager. In short, they expect the same level of information and detail as institutional clients have been accustomed to for decades.

Off the beaten track

Another way in which demand is merging is that private clients are seeking to access new asset classes that had hitherto seemed to be the prerogative of institutionals. Low bond yields have sent investors off the beaten track in search of less conventional solutions with higher return potential, such as private debt and insurance-linked securities. Whereas in the past, private clients tended to stick to hedge funds and private equity when it came to alternative investments, now more and more of them are looking for ways to diversify their portfolios and reduce their volatility by moving away from traditional asset classes.

All they are doing is copying institutional clients, which have long considered private debt an attractive alternative to bonds, but also a rather flexible tool for managing their assets and liabilities. Insurance-linked securities, in particular catastrophe (‘cat’) bonds – bonds issued by insurance or reinsurance companies to transfer risk related to natural disasters – have also appeared, and in fact become quite common, in private clients’ portfolios.

The appeal of sustainable and socially responsible investing is also drawing private investors into an area that used to be the remit of institutionals. After simmering below the surface for a long time, demand from institutional clients for that type of investments surged after the 2008 financial crisis. Private clients were slower to catch on, but they are now properly hooked.

With awareness of environmental and social challenges spreading and the Millennials generation coming onto the scene, the movement keeps gaining momentum and may even exceed expectations. This is backed by responsible investing’s proven performance potential, especially impact investing, which targets companies that are seeking solutions to the current challenges, and those firms are looking the most likely to attract capital and achieve sustained growth over the long term.

In the case of absolute return, private clients were the trend-setters. Wealthy families and individuals were the first, in the 1970s, to go for hedge funds in a bid to achieve steady returns in all market conditions.

At the time for institutional investors, which above all seek to outperform their benchmarks and preserve the balance between their assets and liabilities, absolute return was not the primary aim. However, they gradually started looking at hedge funds in the early 2000s in order to diversify sections of their global portfolios. The trend has persisted as institutional clients want solutions that can generate a minimum return without excessive risk-taking until financial conditions allow them to go back into bonds.

Value for money

Beyond their intersecting needs, private and institutional clients have a common creed: ‘Value for money’. Both categories of clients are prepared to pay the price provided they get their money’s worth. And that value no longer depends solely on the quality of the management; it is also created by the private bank’s or asset manager’s ability to offer innovative products and tailored solutions that truly meet the clients’ needs.

With competition rife, and coming from the likes of passive management and robot advisers, the winners in our industry will be those that are able to offer tangible added value at an attractive price. It’s worth the risk: the need for managing clients’ ever-growing savings has never been bigger. The task comes with huge added challenges on both sides: in private wealth management the baby-boomer generation is starting to scale back, and institutional clients still have low rates to contend with.

Any opinions expressed here are the author’s own.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Read our full disclaimer policy here.

© Opinion 2019

More From Markets