Failure to make interim awards on extensions of time and compensation and properly administer the contract, the most common causes of construction disputes in the Middle East
    Party to party negotiation still the preferred method for resolving disputes across the region

Ongoing liquidity issues within the Middle East construction market has resulted in a steady flow of claims being submitted as contractors take a tougher approach to entitlements, however the industry continues to make progress in resolving them more swiftly, according to the latest research from Arcadis.

The 2018 Global Construction Disputes Report is an annual study from Arcadis that examines the most common causes of dispute on construction projects, as well as the average duration and value of disputes, and the method of dispute resolution most commonly deployed. The findings are based on an assessment of the construction disputes handled by the Arcadis Contract Solutions team in various regions over the previous twelve months.

Length of time needed to resolve disputes continues to fall, however average value rises:

Over the last year, the average length of time needed to resolve a dispute in the Middle East fell to just 13.5 months. This trend towards swifter resolution was also observed last year, and reflects the industry’s focus on trying to improve liquidity across the wider supply chain.

  •  

    Average length of dispute (months)

     

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015

    2016

    2017

    Middle East

    9

    14.6

    13.9

    15.1

    15.2

    13.7

    13.5

    Global average

    10.6

    12.8

    11.8

    13.2

    15.5

    14.3

    14.8

    Fig 1 – Average length of construction disputes handled by Arcadis (2011-2017)

On a less positive note, the average value of disputes increased over the last year, rising to $91m. This was due to a small number of high-value disputes and a flow of ‘mid value’ final account claims.

  •  

    Average value of dispute (US$ millions)

     

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015

    2016

    2017

    Middle East

    112.5

    65

    40.9

    76.7

    82

    56

    91

    Global average

    32.2

    31.7

    32.1

    51

    46

    46

    43.4

    Fig 2 – Average value of construction disputes handled by Arcadis (2011-2017) 

Basic contract understanding still a cause for concern: 

A failure to make interim awards on extensions of time and compensation emerged as the most common cause of disputes on construction projects in the Middle East. This was a new trend however it was very closely followed by a failure to properly administer the terms of the contract which has been a recurring issue in previous years. 

  • Rank

    Most common causes of dispute in 2017

    1

    A failure to make interim awards on extensions of time and compensation

    2

    A failure to properly administer the contract

    3

    Owner directed changes

    Fig 3 – Most common causes of disputes on construction projects handled by Arcadis in 2017  

Rob Nelson-Williams, Regional Head of Contract Solutions, Arcadis Middle East said: In analysing the causes of disputes on construction projects in the Middle East, we continue to see a lot of the same issues crop up. This underlines the need to get the basics right, and the importance of seasoned technical and commercial advice when it comes to contract or claims strategy.”

Party-to-party negotiation still the preferred method for resolving disputes: 

Consistent with previous years, party to party negotiation and arbitration remained the two most common methods of dispute resolution in the Middle East.

  • Rank

    Most common methods of alternative dispute resolution

    1

    Party to party negotiation

    2

    Arbitration

    3

    Dispute adjudication board

    Fig 4 – Most common causes of disputes on construction projects handled by Arcadis in 2017

“Over the next 12 to 18 months, major regional construction related events loom ever closer. As pressure increases to meet fixed deadlines, the need to make smart decisions around contract and procurement strategies will be even more important. Embracing lessons from the past is key to reducing the risk of disputes, but also in helping the industry move towards a more harmonious and less confrontational contracting environment for all parties,” concluded Nelson-Williams.

-Ends-

For further information, please contact:

Arcadis Middle East

Nisha Celina

Marketing & Communications Manager

M: +971 50 872 9518

E: nisha.celina@arcadis.com

About Arcadis:

Arcadis is the leading global Design & Consultancy firm for natural and built assets. Applying our deep market sector insights and collective design, consultancy, engineering, program and cost management services, we work in partnership with our clients to deliver exceptional and sustainable outcomes throughout the lifecycle of their natural and built assets. We are 27,000 people active in over 70 countries that generate €3.3 billion in revenues. www.arcadis.com

About Contract Solutions:

The Arcadis Contract Solutions team helps clients avoid, mitigate, and resolve disputes. The team encompasses a large pool of procurement, contract and risk management professionals. It also includes quantum, delay, project management and engineering defects experts. The team provides procurement, contract and dispute avoidance and management strategies, as well as dispute resolution and expert witness services. This is delivered through a blend of technical expertise, commercial advice, sector insight and the use of live project data, combined with a multi-disciplined and professional focus.

© Press Release 2018

Disclaimer: The contents of this press release was provided from an external third party provider. This website is not responsible for, and does not control, such external content. This content is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither this website nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this press release.

The press release is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither this website nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors or inaccuracies in the content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the information within this article is at your sole risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, this website, its parent company, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and the respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors will not be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, including without limitation, lost profits, lost savings and lost revenues, whether in negligence, tort, contract or any other theory of liability, even if the parties have been advised of the possibility or could have foreseen any such damages.