Advertisement
|28 October, 2018

WGES 2018: Demand for green bonds outweighs standards concerns, says bank head

WGES panel discusses oversight and regulatory approaches to fast-growing market

A man speaks on the phone as he walks past solar panels at the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park in Dubai, November 28, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

A man speaks on the phone as he walks past solar panels at the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park in Dubai, November 28, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

REUTERS/StringerTPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

The sheer weight of demand for green bonds from investors may lead to them prioritising access to the market over any in-depth scrutiny over how such products are structured, the head of a Malaysian bank speaking at the World Green Economy Summit in Dubai last week has said.

Speaking on a panel debate on the second day of WGES on Thursday, Rafe Haneef, CEO of CIMB Islamic Bank, told a panel discussing the green bonds market that currently "more than $50 trillion worth of funds under management are being tagged to some sort of responsible investment", but added that there were currently only around $500 billion worth of green or socially-responsible bonds in the market.

"The gap is huge," Haneef said.

Discussing the requirement for regulation or a harmonisation of global standards, Haneef also warned about the dangers of overregulation.

Advertisement

"Investors don't want to be too insistent in terms of all the standards to be applied just to start the ball rolling. I think eventually, maybe in the spread of about 5-10 years' time, you will see harmonisation," he said.

Hanife Ymer, head of Sustainability Services for KPMG's Lower Gulf region, argued that good governance should be a priority for investors in green bonds.

"Why would you treat issuance of a green bond any different to any other bond issued to the market?" she argued.

"Investors are making decisions about these disclosures, so let's make sure they're true, accurate, complete and governed by the highest parts of the organisation. Investors, if I can be a little bit provocative, I think they just really need to understand the content, the subject matter, a bit better."

Timucin Engin, a senior director at ratings agency S&P Global, said that although the first green bond was issued more than 10 years ago, by the European Investment Bank in 2007, there have only been 3-4 years of "meaningful issues". Over the five year period from 2007-2012, just $11 billion of green bonds were issued, but last year alone green bond issuance increased to over $155 billion.

"If you look at the total outstanding bonds labelled green bonds, there's about $400 billion out there and they represent a very small portion of the market. It is really a space that has a 3-4 year history and everything in this space, from issuers to investors and market practices, are evolving," Engin said.

He said that over the next five years, S&P Global expects green bond issuance to continue growing to reach around $500 billion annually.

"To comply with the objectives of the last 15-20 years we need to invest a significant amount of funds in the green space," Engin said. "Banks will play an important role because they do generate credit for these transactions, but capital markets will also have to play a role," he argued.

Engin also said that he expected more of these green bonds to be issued from emerging markets in the future, stating that China, Mexico and India combined represented "a very small portion of the market" a few years ago.

"Together, they are about 20 percent now and this will continue to grow," Engin said.

Making the right noises

The panelists agreed that standards, and even the language used, by issuers of green bonds in different parts of the world have developed differently, but Engin said that more cross-border funding was taking place in the green bonds market, "so I think more harmonisation in terms of taxonomies will be coming".

Haneef also pointed out that green bond issuers differed in the rigour of their approach, with some only seeking a second-party opinion that bond proceeds are being invested in sustainable projects, others having independent, third party annual audits, and others still doing both of these, as well as seeking stamps of approval from ratings agencies and other green certification bodies.

"So you find different issuers are adopting different standards," he said. Haneef argued that over time, investors may insist that issuers meet at least three, or all four, of these requirements.

"I think eventually the market will evolve," he said. "(But) I think it's better to let the market dictate, as opposed to regulators coming in."

(Reporting by Michael Fahy; Editing by Imogen Lillywhite)

(michael.fahy@refinitiv.com).


Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Read our full disclaimer policy here.