Tuesday, Feb 14, 2012

The following is a press release from Standard & Poor's:

DUBAI (Standard & Poor's) Feb. 14, 2012--Rising tension between Iran and the West is increasing political and economic risks for sovereign and corporate issuers in the Middle East and focusing attention on the key role of the Strait of Hormuz in trade for the Gulf, says Standard & Poor's Ratings Services in a series of three new reports (see list of publications below).

In response to tougher sanctions, including a boycott of Iranian oil exports by the EU, Iran has threatened retaliation, notably in the form of a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a conduit for the flow of oil and gas out of the Gulf.

So far, these threats have been verbal, but analysts are not ruling out the possibility that the current exchanges of rhetoric could spark disruptions to trade flowing through the Strait, or even in an extreme scenario, military confrontation.

At this time, we think the current developments in relation to Iran are captured in our ratings on countries and corporate issuers in the region and so we do not expect any immediate actions. Nevertheless, political pressures in the Middle East are acute, and any sudden deterioration in the situation could lead us to reassess this view.

In the absence of a diplomatic solution, we believe Iran could respond in some way to the latest wave of sanctions and international pressure, most likely--and past behavior suggests this--through low-level provocation.

For example, Iranian authorities could slow shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and disrupt the timely supply of oil from the Gulf by imposing tanker inspections, boarding merchant ships, and otherwise obstructing shipping routes in its territorial waters.

Such low-scale provocation and simmering tension would in our view keep oil prices at their currently high level. This is because markets would increasingly view the specter of armed conflict as a real, if remote, possibility.

"For oil-producing sovereigns of the Gulf Cooperation Council--Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and to a lesser extent, Bahrain--higher oil prices would actually be beneficial," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Elliot Hentov. "As oil exporters, they would receive more foreign earnings that they could either use to stimulate demand or improve their government's balance sheets."

In contrast, the fiscal and external balances of oil importers in the Middle East--especially Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon--are already stretched. As such, they are ill prepared for a further rise in oil prices. Furthermore, countries in need of attracting investor appetite in 2012, such as Egypt, could suffer from an elevated risk premium in their debt financing. Other non-oil trade could also be affected because of higher transaction and logistics costs for shipping imports into the Gulf states through the Strait of Hormuz.

Our corporate and infrastructure ratings and outlooks also already address the less-than-complete structural mitigants against a severe deterioration in the political climate," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Karim Nassif. "Yet, we would re-examine our base-case geopolitical assumptions as well as their effect on our rated corporate and infrastructure issuers if a prolonged disruption in the Strait becomes more likely."

Although we currently see a very low likelihood of a severe disruption of oil supplies through the Strait, a potential oil shock would pose a worrying specter. "Such a disruption of oil supply, should it continue over a period of several months, would in our view lead to a spike in oil prices, which would fuel inflation and upset a fragile economic recovery in both developed and emerging markets," said Standard & Poor's chief economist for Europe Jean-Michel Six. "The ensuing uncertainty would also likely unsettle financial markets, leading to higher bond yields and once again add to refinancing difficulties for sovereigns on the periphery of the eurozone."

While it's uncertain how rapidly or how high oil prices would rise in such a scenario, our economists envisage that a price of $150 per barrel is not absurd, and would most likely push the world economies into a recession.

 The reports are entitled:

 -- The Impact Of Rising Gulf Tensions On Sovereigns In The Middle East

 -- Closing The Strait Of Hormuz: The Risks For Corporate And Infrastructure Issuers

 -- Tension in the Gulf: How An Oil Shock Could Threaten Global Economic Growth

The reports are available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase copies of these reports by calling (1) 212-438-7280 or sending an e-mail to research_request@standardandpoors.com. Ratings information can also be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site by using the Ratings search box located in the left column at www.standardandpoors.com. Alternatively, call one of the following Standard &

Poor's numbers: Client Support Europe (44) 20-7176-7176; London Press Office

(44) 20-7176-3605; Paris (33) 1-4420-6708; Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-225;

Stockholm (46) 8-440-5914; or Moscow (7) 495-783-4009.

Primary Credit Analysts: Elliot Hentov, PhD, Dubai (44) 20-7176-7071; Elliot_Hentov@standardandpoors.com

Karim Nassif, Dubai +971 (0) 4 372 7152; karim_nassif@standardandpoors.com

EMEA Chief Economist: Jean-Michel Six, Paris (33)-1-44-20-67-05;  jean-michel_six@standardandpoors.com

Media Contacts: Sharon Beach, London (44) 20-7176-3536; sharon_beach@standardandpoors.com

Matthew McAdam, London (44) 20-7176-3541; matthew_mcadam@standardandpoors.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and

(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires

14-02-12 0255GMT