KEY RATING DRIVERS
The downgrade reflects the following key rating drivers:
The government has yet to identify a clear medium-term strategy to tackle high deficits and there is no clarity on a timeline towards the development of such a strategy. The government has continued to implement a number of measures to raise revenue and trim spending, including excise taxes at end-2017 and fuel price increases in January 2018. However, the consolidation effort is not close to stabilising government debt/GDP, which increased to 81.5% in 2017 from 73.3% in 2016 and from less than 40% in 2012. We project government debt/GDP to rise above 100% in the medium term. The fiscal break-even oil price remains close to USD100/barrel, according to Fitch's estimates.
The political environment, embedded social expectations and a lack of experience with taxation severely constrain the government from enacting a sharper fiscal adjustment and create uncertainty around the fiscal outlook. The gradualist approach to deficit reduction and lack of a medium-term fiscal strategy partly reflect the difficulty of building consensus over the pressing need for fiscal consolidation. Reining in the deficit more sharply could call for deeper reforms to Bahrain's social and economic model, traditionally characterised by low taxation and generous benefits. In Fitch's view, the country's leadership is generally committed to reform, but this commitment is not yet shared by other key stakeholders, and the government remains wary of social pressures.
The preliminary 2017 budget deficit narrowed to 11.6% of GDP (including extra-budgetary spending, estimated at 2.6% of GDP in 2017), from 16.0% of GDP in 2016. Higher oil prices, with average Brent crude prices up to USD55/b from USD45/b, accounted for half of the deficit reduction. Non-oil revenue increased more than budgeted and accounted for a quarter of the deficit reduction, while a decline in overall spending accounted for another quarter. Expenditure declined across most spending lines, but rising interest costs eroded just over half of the savings on primary spending. Interest costs rose to 21.5% of revenue, three times bigger than the ratio in 2014 and double the 'BB' peer median.
We forecast that the budget deficit will narrow close to 9% of GDP in 2019, still more than double the projected 'BB' median, assuming average Brent crude oil prices of USD52.5/b in 2018 and USD55/b in 2019. Oil prices would need to improve to around USD70-75/b on average to reduce the deficit to levels that would stabilise government debt/GDP in 2018-2019. Non-oil revenue will increase by 1% of GDP, assuming implementation of VAT in mid-2019 after the new parliament is in place following elections late this year. Further incremental reforms will reduce the drag on net oil revenue from subsidised fuel and gas sales. The wage bill and subsidy and transfer spending combined will decline by more than 2% of GDP, but rising interest costs will erode almost half of those spending gains. We forecast that Bahrain's fiscal break-even oil price will be around USD95/b in 2019.
We expect the consolidated gross general government debt ratio to surpass 90% of GDP in 2019 and to keep rising in the following years, albeit with a shallower upward trajectory, breaking 100% of GDP in 2023. Debt as a percentage of government revenue is expected to rise to 540% in 2019, one of the highest among Fitch-rated sovereigns. The government has started work on setting up a separate debt directorate, but has yet to agree on a medium-term fiscal framework.
Bahrain's 'BB-' ratings also reflect the following key rating drivers:
Bahrain's ratings are supported by high GDP per capita and human development indicators relative even to the 'BBB' median, a developed financial sector and the boost to external financing flexibility from strong GCC support.
Fitch estimates real GDP growth of 3.3% in 2017 and forecasts growth of 3.1% in 2018-2019, with risks to the upside. This reflects constant hydrocarbon volumes (after a decline in 2017) and a moderation of real non-hydrocarbon growth to 3.8% from an estimated 4.5% in 2017. Spending on projects financed by the USD7.5 billion (20% of GDP) GCC Development Fund provides the most significant support to growth amid government retrenchment. Growth is also supported by state-owned enterprise projects (in oil, gas, and aluminium).
The GCC Development Fund reflects the broader support that Bahrain enjoys from some GCC countries, particularly Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. This support is rooted in deep historical, cultural and familial ties as well as regional rivalries. Bahrain gets most of its oil from the Abu Sa'afa field shared with Saudi Arabia (it is entitled to 50% of production, but has sometimes received significantly more as a form of support). In Fitch's view, further material support from the GCC would be forthcoming in case of extreme political, financial, or fiscal instability, given Bahrain's small size and strategic importance. The expectation of such support has supported Bahrain's market access and US dollar peg despite extremely low foreign exchange reserves, which fell to an estimated one month of current external payments at end-2017.
Over time the government could attempt to monetise state assets, notably parts of Mumtalakat Holding Company, for some financing. Mumtalakat has a portfolio of assets with a balance sheet value of around 30% of GDP. The government is not currently pursuing asset sales, but a Mumtalakat dividend was included in the 2017-18 budget for the first time.
Political fault lines, both domestic and regional, will continue to be a source of tension in Bahrain. Lack of reconciliation between the government and the predominantly Shia opposition generates sporadic incidents of violence. The two main opposition groups have been banned and the hard-line stance against some opposition individuals and Shiite leaders has continued. The apparent sabotage of an oil pipeline in November highlighted the additional risk of terrorism. However, the seventh anniversary of the 2011 uprisings passed without much incident in February and Fitch's baseline assumption is that Bahrain's security forces will continue to prevent the sort of escalation of domestic tensions that would materially affect economic stability.
SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO)
Fitch's proprietary SRM assigns Bahrain a score equivalent to a rating of 'BB+' on the Long-Term Foreign-Currency (LT FC) IDR scale.
Fitch's sovereign rating committee adjusted the output from the SRM to arrive at the final LT FC IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows:
- External Finances: +1 notch, to reflect the boost to external financing flexibility from strong GCC support.
- Public Finances: -2 notches, to reflect the high and rising debt trajectory, which we do not project to stabilise in the medium term, and the rigidity of government revenue and expenditure.
- Structural Features: -1 notch, to reflect the political and social constraints on fiscal policy, which prevent the government from cutting expenditure more rapidly and make it harder to use GDP per capita for generating more substantial diversified revenue.
Fitch's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three-year centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a LT FC IDR. Fitch's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM.
The main factors that could lead to negative rating action are:
-Further significant deterioration of debt dynamics, combined with increased financing constraints.
- Severe deterioration of the domestic security environment.
The main factors that could lead to positive rating action are:
- A narrowing of the budget deficit consistent with the government debt-to-GDP ratio reaching a peak in the medium term.
- A broadly accepted political solution to domestic political tensions.
- Brent crude will average USD52.5/bbl in 2018 and USD55/bbl in 2019.
- No change to the rule of the royal family.
- Regional conflicts will not directly impact Bahrain or its ability to trade.
- No change to the peg of the Bahraini dinar to the US dollar.
The full list of rating actions is as follows:
Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+'; Outlook Stable
Long-Term Local-Currency IDR downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+'; Outlook Stable
Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Short-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'
Country Ceiling downgraded to 'BBB-'from 'BBB+'
Issue ratings on long-term senior unsecured foreign-currency bonds downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+'
Issue ratings on long-term senior unsecured local-currency bonds downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+'
Issue ratings on short-term senior unsecured local-currency bonds affirmed at 'B'
Issue ratings on the sukuk trust certificates issued by CBB International Sukuk Company 5 and 6 have been downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+'
+852 2263 9832
Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited
19/F Man Yee Building
68 Des Voeux Road Central
+852 2263 9831
+852 2263 9910
Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: email@example.com.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Country Ceilings Criteria (pub. 21 Jul 2017)
Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 21 Jul 2017)
Sukuk Rating Criteria (pub. 14 Aug 2017)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2018 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO’s credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.