We assign Short-Term IDRs according to the mapping correspondence described in our rating criteria. A 'BBB+' Long-Term IDR can correspond to a Short-Term IDR of either 'F2' or 'F1'. In the case of CBI, we opted for 'F2', the lower of the two Short-Term IDR options. This is because a significant proportion of UAE banking sector funding is related to the government and a stress scenario for banks is likely to come at a time when the sovereign itself is experiencing some form of stress. Fitch judges this "wrong-way" risk to be high in the UAE, and this is reflected in the Short-Term IDR, which primarily reflects CBI's liquidity and funding profile.
CBI's VR reflects the bank's weak franchise (market share below 1%), a less diversified business model than peers, weak and volatile asset quality metrics, low and highly vulnerable capital ratios in light of the bank's concentrated balance sheet, elevated capital encumbrance and weak profitability metrics.
The VR also takes into account acceptable management and strategy, adequate liquidity and the ordinary support, including liquidity support, the bank enjoys from its largest shareholder Qatar National Bank (QNB; A+/Stable/F1; 40% stake).
CBI has a small franchise and market share in the UAE, accounting for about 0.6% of total banking system assets and deposits at end-2019. The bank's business model remains concentrated, with a higher exposure than domestic peers to the trade and services sectors.
Prior to the regional tensions, QNB's shareholding in CBI allowed the two banks to participate together in syndicated transactions, providing CBI with a competitive advantage compared with other UAE small banks. However, these benefits have now diminished.
CBI's loan book is characterised by high single-obligor and sector concentrations, with the top 20 funded exposures representing 3x the bank's common equity Tier 1 (CET1) at end-2019, well above domestic peers and exposing the bank to event risk. CBI also has high exposure to sectors that are vulnerable in the current economic environment, with trade, business and investment, services and real estate and construction making up 70% of the bank's loan book at end-2019. This is compounded by high exposures to problematic exposures, especially New Medical Center (NMC) and related companies, amounting to 24% of the bank's CET1 capital at end-2019.
Despite high levels of write-offs, CBI's asset quality metrics weakened in 2019, with the stage 3 loans ratio rising to 12.7% from 9.4% at end-2018, driven by higher stage 3 inflows in the service and construction sectors. CBI's concentrated underwriting profile heightens the volatility of the bank's asset quality metrics, with the top 20 stage 3 exposures representing about 90% of total stage 3 financing. CBI's reserve coverage of stage 3 financing remained weak at 51% at end-2019 and was one of the lowest among domestic peers.
Stage 2 loans accounted for a further 16.2% of gross loans, giving a problem loans ratio (stage 2 + stage 3 loans) of 29% at end-2019 and heightening the vulnerability of the stage 3 ratio to migration of stage 2 loans. Loan loss coverage of problem loans was low at 23% at end-2019, leaving the bank's financial performance highly vulnerable to asset quality developments. Considering the bank's problematic exposures and the weaker economic and business environment driven by the COVID-19 outbreak and lower oil prices, we expect the bank's problem loans ratio to increase in 2020-2021.
Measures announced in March 2020 by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (CBUAE) allowing a broad range of customers to defer their loan servicing commitments and where necessary to restructure loans will slow impaired loans recognition in the near term. However, borrowers' ability to recover and maintain or resume debt servicing payments will depend to a large extent on the duration of lockdown measures in the UAE, travel restrictions and global economic trends.
Earnings and profitability metrics have remained variable and are much weaker than domestic peers, given high vulnerability to loan impairment charges (LICs) and weaker operating efficiency. Fitch's key earnings and profitability metric - operating profit/risk-weighted assets (RWAs) - demonstrates the variability of the bank's operating profitability, ranging from -2.9% to 1.5% over the last five years. Subdued business conditions and low loan growth as a result of COVID-19 economic-related disruptions will pressure earnings generation in 2020-2021. LICs are expected to increase in line with expected deterioration in the bank's loan quality metrics and this will be aggravated by the bank's already weak reserve coverage of stage 3 loans.
In line with the bank's transformation plan, CBI has been executing well in scaling back its operating expenses through the rationalisation of the distribution network and headcount reductions, as reflected in the reduction in the Fitch-calculated cost-to-income ratio to 48% in 2019 from 54% in 2016. However, we do not expect the ratio to continue declining given the revenue pressures caused by a less supportive economic environment.
We view CBI's capital ratios as weaker than at other Fitch-rated UAE peers, with a CET1 ratio of only 11.3% at end-2019. The ratio improved in 2019, supported by deleveraging despite low internal capital generation. The bank's total capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.4% at end-2019, providing comfortable buffers over minimum regulatory requirements. We believe regulatory forbearance allowing banks to partially add back increases in stage 1 and stage 2 IFRS 9 expected credit loss provisions to regulatory capital will provide some support to CBI's regulatory capital buffers and partially offset the expected deterioration in asset quality and profitability metrics.
However, CBI's low core capital buffers are highly vulnerable, given the bank's concentrated underwriting, weak underlying asset quality and the high level of unreserved stage 3 loans (45% of CET1 capital at end-2019), underpinning the bank's weak loss-absorption capacity. We expect the bank's core capital buffers to remain weak over our rating horizon, given the absence of planned core capital issuance and expected lower internal capital generation.
CBI is largely funded by stable customer deposits, which accounted for about 85% of total non-equity funding at end-2019. Customer deposits are 46% corporate-related, which have historically been stable, while retail deposits accounted for a further 33% at end-2019. Single-depositor concentration is high, with the 20-largest deposits accounting for 44% of the total at end-2019. CBI complements its deposit funding with interbank funding and perpetual additional Tier 1 securities, demonstrating reasonable access to capital markets as well as ordinary parental support from QNB.
We view CBI's liquidity profile as adequate and comparing well with peers. However, the loans-to-deposits ratio rose to 104% at end-2019 from 88% at end-2018 on the back of the bank's strategy to shed expensive term deposits. CBI maintains a reasonable cushion of net liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents, net short-term interbank placements and liquid securities), which represented 11% of total assets and covered 18% of customer deposits at end-2019. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, SR, SRF
CBI's IDRs, SR and SRF are sensitive to a change in Fitch's view of the creditworthiness of the UAE authorities and on their propensity to support the banking system or the bank.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
Deterioration in our view of the creditworthiness of the UAE authorities or their propensity to support the banking system or the bank could lead to a downgrade of the bank's IDRs.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
Given our existing view of the high creditworthiness of the UAE and high propensity to support the banking system and the bank, positive rating action on the bank's Long-Term IDR is unlikely. However, a significantly higher market share could be positive for the ratings if this strengthens our view of the bank's systemic importance in the UAE.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
Pressure on CBI's VR could result from further deterioration in asset quality, especially increasing stage 2 and stage 3 loans as a share of gross loans affecting the bank's profitability and leading to an erosion of the bank's core capital ratios and increasing capital encumbrance.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
Sustained improvement in the bank's asset quality and profitability leading to much lower capital encumbrance and/or an expansion in the bank's domestic franchise could lead to an upgrade of the VR but this is unlikely in the short term. Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria. Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings CBI's IDRs, SR and SRF reflect a high probability of support available to the bank from the UAE authorities if needed. ESG Considerations The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity(ies), either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being managed by the entity(ies). For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit
Commercial Bank International P.S.C.; Long Term Issuer Default Rating; Affirmed; BBB+; RO:Sta ; Short Term Issuer Default Rating; Affirmed; F2 ; Viability Rating; Affirmed; b+ ; Support Rating; Affirmed; 2 ; Support Rating Floor; Affirmed; BBB+
Contacts: Primary Rating Analyst Huseyin Sevinc, Director +44 20 3530 1027 Fitch Ratings Ltd 30 North Colonnade, Canary Wharf London E14 5GN
Secondary Rating Analyst Aurelien Mourgues, Director +44 20 3530 1855
Committee Chairperson James Watson, Managing Director +7 495 956 6657
Media Relations: Louisa Williams, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 2452, Email: email@example.com
Additional information is available on
Applicable Criteria Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 28 Feb 2020) (including rating assumption sensitivity) ()
Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form () Solicitation Status () Endorsement Status () Endorsement Policy ()
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: (). IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING () DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT (). FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2020 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see ), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.