India’s stance on MEG imports from GCC is damaging, GPCA warns

India’s recent adoption of trade protectionist measures on mono ethylene glycol (MEG) imports from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia is damaging to its domestic market

  

India’s recent adoption of trade protectionist measures on mono ethylene glycol (MEG) imports from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia is damaging to its domestic market, the Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA), the regional trade body, representing the common interests of the chemical and allied industries in the Arabian Gulf, has warned today (October 20).

The comments come after India’s Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) initiated a new anti-dumping investigation into MEG imports from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the USA on June 28, 2021. The investigation – described by GPCA as “unjustified” and in breach of the rules laid by the World Trade Organization – was prompted by an application from two of India’s heavyweight chemical manufacturers.

The news alarmingly comes only a few months after India terminated another anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of MEG originating in or exported from Saudi Arabia (on April 6, 2020), Kuwait, Oman, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates (on November 20, 2020), after the application filed by one of the two companies was withdrawn following extensive diplomatic and political engagement.

GPCA has called for the immediate termination of the investigation in line with India’s obligations under the WTO Agreements, of which the country is a member. The association further notes that since the establishment of the WTO in 1995, India has initiated 23 anti-dumping investigations and imposed seven anti-dumping measures against Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. This figure is more than four times the number of investigations initiated, and measures imposed by any other WTO member.

According to a report by India’s Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, India is net short of MEG with current demand of around 2.5 million metric tonnes (MT). As this shortfall is expected to continue, GPCA warns India will need to import more MEG to satisfy domestic demand and ensure that prices are sustainable. The continuous pursual of trade protectionist measures against countries in the GCC, which represent India’s largest chemicals import partner, could not only prove damaging to its domestic market, but also jeopardise exports, thereby creating a bottleneck.

“The new anti-dumping application is utterly unjustified as it is not based on valid legal and factual grounds. It also lacks evidence of MEG imports being dumped from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait,” Dr Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun, Secretary General, GPCA, has commented. “The price at which MEG feedstock is imported from the two GCC states is based on market considerations and is in fact not different for MEG that is sold domestically or exported.

“Furthermore, there was no spike in MEG export volume from the two countries to India during the period of investigation (January1, 2020 to December 31, 2020). Rather, there was a decline in comparison to the previous year. To state that India’s MEG industry is suffering a material injury would be simply untrue. I can certify with confidence that from the research that GPCA has conducted and the facts on the ground, MEG imports from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia cannot have negatively impacted India’s domestic industry’s performance.”

Dr Al-Sadoun further urged the Indian authorities to end the practice of utilising anti-dumping measures as a tool to achieve goals that are “not legally permitted and for protectionist purposes”. “While this may seem alluring and only too common in the current global trade landscape, rising trade protectionism is only damaging to the very states which adopt it; it can hinder economic prosperity, obstruct long standing business relationships, and jeopardise investments,” he added.--TradeArabia News Service

Copyright 2021 Al Hilal Publishing and Marketing Group Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).

Disclaimer: The content of this article is syndicated or provided to this website from an external third party provider. We are not responsible for, and do not control, such external websites, entities, applications or media publishers. The body of the text is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither we nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this article. Read our full disclaimer policy here.

More From Markets