ADIB's IDRs, SR and SRF reflect an extremely high probability of support available to the bank from the UAE and Abu Dhabi authorities if needed.
Fitch's view of support factors in the sovereign's strong capacity to support the banking system, sustained by sovereign wealth funds and recurring revenue mostly from hydrocarbon production. Fitch also expects high willingness from the authorities to support the banking sector. This has been demonstrated by the UAE authorities' long track record of supporting domestic banks, as well as close ties with and part government ownership links to a number of banks.
ADIB's SRF is at the Abu Dhabi Domestic Systemically Important Banks' (D-SIB) SRF of 'A+', reflecting the bank's high systemic importance. ADIB enjoys a 5% share of total system assets. Abu Dhabi banks' D-SIB SRF is one notch higher than other UAE banks', due to Abu Dhabi's superior financial flexibility.
SPV AND SENIOR DEBT
The ratings of senior unsecured debt (sukuk) issued by ADIB's special purpose vehicle (SPV), ADIB Sukuk Company are in line with the bank's Long- and Short-Term IDRs because Fitch views the likelihood of default on any senior unsecured obligation issued by the SPV the same as the likelihood of default of the bank.
The Viability Rating (VR) of ADIB reflects its weak asset quality, low coverage of impaired financing, sizeable balance sheet concentrations, weak - albeit improved - core capitalisation and high related-party lending. The VR also takes into account the bank's strong and resilient UAE-wide franchise, especially in Islamic retail banking, as well as strong profitability, sound liquidity and stable funding.
Despite lower growth, ADIB has maintained its 5% share of UAE banking sector assets and customer financing. ADIB is the second-largest UAE Islamic bank (behind Dubai Islamic Bank) and the fourth-largest Islamic bank globally by total assets. The bank's solid deposit franchise supports the VR.
ADIB's UAE-wide franchise is a strength for the bank's funding and liquidity. Customer deposits accounted for 92% of the bank's total funding base at end-2018, including 69% of low-cost deposits, which have proven stable. Net liquid assets cover 17% of total assets and 21% of total deposits. The 20-largest deposits represented 19% of the total at end-2018, which is below concentration levels seen at other UAE banks.
ADIB's asset quality remains weak. At end-2018, ADIB reported an impaired financing ratio of 4.8%, in line with the banking sector average. Impaired financing is concentrated on the bank's real estate and international financing portfolios. While impaired financing levels are acceptable, the total potential problem financing ratio, which includes stage 2 financing, is much higher, at 14.8% at end-2018. The bulk of stage 2 financings are restructured financings, mostly legacy exposures. The coverage of impaired financing (73%) was below medium-sized peers' average (100%) at end-2018 and unreserved impaired financing represented 8% of equity.
Related-party financing accounted for a high 47% of equity at end-2018. This mostly relates to exposure to ADIB's controlling shareholder and also translates into high financing concentration. The top 20 exposures make up 20% of total gross financing, albeit still lower than most UAE peers'.
ADIB's core capital improved following an AED1 billion rights issue in October 2018, which followed the bank's first rights issue of AED504 million in August 2015. The FCC ratio increased to 12.8% at end-2018 from 10.9% at end-2017, which Fitch views as sufficient for the bank's current moderate growth plans. However ADIB's FCC ratio remains below the sector average. The bank is compliant with the 9.5% minimum fully loaded (from 1 January 2019) regulatory CET1 ratio in the UAE. ADIB's Total Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and Tier 1 ratio are now in line with the peers' average.
Performance remained strong in 2018 but equity-based return ratios were down slightly due to the increased capital base. ADIB's strong retail franchise provides a lower cost of funding than peers', which supports a higher net financing margin (NFM). Revenue diversification is limited given ADIB's focus on local Islamic banking without any other large source of revenue. ADIB's cost-to-income ratio is significantly above the UAE average due to its large branch network relative to the bank's size, although this network benefits the bank's NFM. Financing impairment charges have remained low but could increase in 2019 if ADIB increases the provisioning level on its problem financing book, which is currently low.
In assessing ADIB's ratings, we consider important differences between Islamic and conventional banks. These factors include closer analysis of regulatory oversight, disclosure, accounting standards and corporate governance. Islamic banks' ratings do not express an opinion on the bank's compliance with sharia. Fitch will assess non-compliance with sharia if it has credit implications.
ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE SCORES
All Islamic banks need to ensure compliance of their entire operations and activities with sharia principles and rules. This entails additional costs, processes, disclosures, regulations, reporting and sharia audit. This results in a governance structure relevance score of '4' (in contrast to a typical relevance influence score of '3' for comparable conventional banks). In addition, ADIB's governance structure relevance score of '4' reflects the bank's high related- party lending.
IDRS, SR AND SRF
ADIB's IDRs, SR and SRF are sensitive to a change in Fitch's view of the creditworthiness of the UAE and Abu Dhabi authorities and on their propensity to support the banking system or the bank.
SPV AND SENIOR DEBT
The ratings of senior debt issued by the SPV are sensitive to changes in the bank's IDRs.
Pressure on ADIB's VR could result from deterioration in asset quality or core capital ratios, particularly concerning the recovery of legacy exposures. A sustained improvement in asset quality and capital ratios could lead to an upgrade of the VR.
The rating actions are as follows:
Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank
Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'A+'; Outlook Stable
Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F1'
Viability Rating affirmed at 'bb'
Support Rating affirmed at '1'
Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'A+'
ADIB Sukuk Company Ltd:
Trust certificate issuance programme affirmed at 'A+'/'F1'
Under Fitch's Global Bank Rating Criteria, Fitch's SRFs are based on the ability and propensity of the government to provide support. Within the UAE, Fitch assesses the potential for support at federal level as Fitch believes that support would be forthcoming from the UAE authorities acting together. However, in respect of Abu Dhabi, Fitch has varied the criteria to reflect the superior financial flexibility of the Abu Dhabi authorities. As such, the SRFs for banks in Abu Dhabi are based on Fitch's assessment of the ability and propensity of the Abu Dhabi authorities to provide support in its own right. This results in a one notch higher SRF for Abu Dhabi banks (compared with other UAE banks), and results in a one notch higher rating for the bank.
+44 20 3530 1836
Fitch Ratings Ltd
30 North Colonnade
London E14 5GN
+971 4424 1208
+7 495 956 6657
Media Relations: Louisa Williams, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 2452, Email: email@example.com.
Additional information is available on
Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)
Short-Term Ratings Criteria (pub. 02 May 2019)
Sukuk Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Jul 2018)
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see ), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.