Shell, along with other European oil majors, has set targets to slowly move away from oil production while investing in non-fossil energy sources like solar and wind power.
Billionaire Daniel Loeb, who runs Third Point, said on Wednesday that the company is being pushed in "too many different directions," and that it should consider separating its legacy energy production from renewables and liquefied natural gas (LNG) businesses, a notion company officials rejected.
"If you were to split that into component pieces, I think that can sound really interesting from a financial perspective," finance chief Jessica Uhl told reporters on Thursday.
"But in terms of real solutions, I think that breaks down and our ability to integrate and bring these different pieces of the puzzle together will be how we uniquely make a difference in the energy transition."
Shell Chief Executive Ben van Beurden told reporters that Shell's strategy is coherent and well understood by a majority of its shareholders.
Over the past two years, Shell shares have posted a total return of negative 16%, according to Refinitiv Eikon data. Those returns lag U.S. majors Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp, though over a longer period, Shell and other European companies have outperformed their U.S. counterparts, who have focused less on emissions reduction and renewable investments. urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL1N2RN2JC
Shell reported third-quarter profit of $4.13 billion on Thursday, below analysts' forecast provided by the company of $5.31 billion. Shares fell 3%.
Some investors on Thursday said they agreed with Shell's approach.
"It's not by splitting that we are going to tackle the climate challenges," said Naïm Abou-Jaoudé, chief executive of investment manager Candriam, who said Shell's strategy of investing in new alternative energy over time and gradually phasing out fossil fuels, would be easier as a single company.
Bernstein analyst Oswald Clint, who has an outperform rating on Shell, said in a note that a minority listing of Shell's marketing business might make financial sense, but that a full split of the company would hamper future earnings.
Shell set itself a tougher emissions-cutting targets for its direct emissions, aiming to halve them by 2030 in absolute terms rather than just cutting intensity-based emissions, which leaves open the possibility of an overall increase.
Shell's direct emissions are dwarfed by the emissions caused by the combustion of its products through its customers, known as Scope 3.
The company has pledged to become a net-zero emissions company by 2050, but is under pressure to make faster progress, with a Dutch court ordering it in May to cut all of its emissions - including Scope 3 - by 45% by 2030.
Shell is appealing the court ruling, with van Beurden saying earlier this year that "a court ordering one energy company to reduce its emissions – and the emissions of its customers – is not the answer" to reducing global emissions.
Coal and natural gas demand has already reached new peaks, surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with oil not far behind. Gas and power prices surged this autumn as tight gas supplies have collided with strong demand in economies recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Shell's cashflow from operations in the quarter rose by around 54% on the year to $16 billion, which in turn helped it to reduce net debt to $57.5 billion, compared with $65.7 billion in the previous quarter.
The company said its LNG production will rise to 8-8.6 million tonnes in the fourth quarter.
(Reporting by Shadia Nasralla; Editing by Jason Neely, Mark Potter, Barbara Lewis, Christina Fincher and Marguerita Choy) ((Shadia.Nasralla@thomsonreuters.com; +44 778 99 43141; Reuters Messaging: Reuters Messaging: email@example.com))