(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

Fitch Ratings-London-March 18: Fitch Ratings has affirmed Doha Bank Q.P.S.C.'s (DB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A' with a Stable Outlook. At the same time, the agency has affirmed DB's Viability Rating (VR) at 'bb+'. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDRS, SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

DB's IDRs, Support Rating (SR) and Support Rating Floor (SRF) reflect Fitch's expectation of an extremely high probability of support from the Qatari authorities for domestic banks in case of need. This reflects Qatar's strong ability to support its banks, as indicated by its rating (AA-/Stable), combined with Fitch's belief that there is a strong willingness to support the banking sector and the bank. The latter is based on a strong track record of sovereign support to the banking sector including i) between 2009 and 1Q11 when some banks received capital injections to enhance their capital buffers and the government purchased some problem assets from the banks; and ii) during 2H17 when the Qatari authorities placed significant deposits across the banks to support sector liquidity following the start of the blockade between Qatar and some of its neighbours. The government owns stakes in all Qatari banks.

The government has demonstrated a strong commitment to its banks and key public sector companies. The sovereign's capacity to support the banking system is sustained by significant sovereign reserves and revenues, mostly from hydrocarbon production, despite lower oil prices.

DB's SRF is at the Qatari bank's domestic systemically important bank (D-SIB) SRF of 'A', and is not differentiated by franchise or level of government ownership because we believe there is an extremely high probability that all rated Qatari banks would receive support should they require it. This belief also partly reflects the risk of contagion (small number of banks and high concentration of banks in the system) and the importance of the banking system in building the local economy.

The Stable Outlook on DB's Long-Term IDR mirrors that on the Qatari sovereign.

SPVs AND SENIOR DEBT

The ratings of debt issued by DB's special purpose vehicle (SPV) are in line with the parent's Long- or Short-Term IDRs, because Fitch views the likelihood of default on any senior unsecured obligation issued by the SPV the same as the likelihood of the default of the bank.

VR

DB's 'bb+' VR reflects weak asset quality metrics in relation to peers and high concentrations, the ensuing weak profitability, only adequate core capital ratios and tight liquidity and its reliance on foreign funding.

Nevertheless, DB's VR is underpinned by its well-established domestic franchise in Qatar, where it is the fifth-largest bank, with market shares of about 6%-7% in loans and deposits at end-2018. However, the bank's business model is being challenged, due to its aggressive risk appetite in largely targeting the private sector, including the riskier contracting segment.

DB's asset quality metrics continued to deteriorate in 2018 and remain weaker than most peers. The impaired loans ratio increased to a high 5.9% at end-2018 (end-2017: 3.6%), primarily reflecting loan book seasoning in the bank's contracting financing (16% impaired loans ratio in this segment) and problems in its Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) operations (a high 35% of which is impaired, including lumpy exposures impacted by the political dispute). Non-performing loan (NPL) origination (net new NPLs/average loans) increased to a high 2.4% in 2018.

Asset quality risks remain high at DB, given its high exposure to the higher-risk contracting and real estate sectors, which accounted for about 45% of the loan book at end-2018 and lower than peers exposure to less-risky government lending (only 6% of loans). Stage 2 loans are also significant at 31% of total loans suggesting the potential for further NPL growth, although the high level was partly due to the transition to IFRS 9 in 1Q18. Reserve coverage of impaired loans is high (138% at end-2018) albeit more moderate compared with total NPLs and Stage 2 loans (22% coverage). Real estate exposures are typically well covered with collateral.

Weakening asset quality is impacting profitability, with loan impairment charges absorbing a high 53% of pre-impairment operating profit in 2018. As a result, operating profit to risk-weighted assets (RWAs) fell considerably to 1.1% and return on equity was a weak 9.1%. DB's net interest margin shrunk 20bp (to 2.5% in 2018) reflecting materially increased funding costs and despite the bank's active repricing efforts. However, DB's cost/income fell to 32% (from 38% in 2017) through good cost control and is now more in line with peers. We expect loan impairment charges/gross loans to remain high at DB given asset quality pressures. Profitability could deteriorate significantly in case of a marked further weakening of asset quality.

DB's Fitch Core Capital (FCC) ratio is only adequate and fell to 11.1% at end-2018 from 13.5% at end-2017, primarily due to the large impact from IFRS9 implementation equivalent to QAR1.8 billion. The FCC ratio is lower than most peers. DB's Tier 1 and total capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 15.8% and 17.0% are supported by QAR4 billion additional Tier 1 notes and about QAR900 million of Tier 2 capital, respectively. We consider DB's core capital ratios low in light of bank's high loan concentration and weakening asset quality and profitability. However, this is somewhat mitigated by DB's high coverage of total loan loss allowances.

Deposits represented about 66% of non-equity funding at end-2018, as wholesale funding has increased. DB's deposit base remains concentrated and is dominated by government deposits (52% of customer deposits at end-2018), which have increased since the blockade began. Nevertheless, a high 28% of customer deposits are from foreign depositors, increasing risks for deposit outflows. Interbank deposits (12% of funding) and repos (11%) increased in 2018 as customer deposits fell. A change in investor sentiment could therefore put pressure on DB's funding and liquidity given the bank's high reliance on wholesale funding. In addition, liquid assets (including interbank placements, unencumbered securities and cash balances less mandatory reserves) represented a modest 20% of assets and 35% of customer deposits at end-2018, with the gross loans-to-deposits ratio having increased to 117% at end-2018, which is higher than most peers.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

[IDRs, SR AND SRF

DB's IDRs, SR and SRF are sensitive to a change in Fitch's assumptions around the Qatari authorities' propensity or ability to provide timely support to the banking sector or to DB. A downgrade of the sovereign would result in a downgrade of DB's IDRs.

SPV AND SENIOR DEBT

The ratings of debt issued by the SPV are sensitive to changes in their parent's IDRs.]

VR

A marked weakening in the operating environment could weaken DB's risk profile, as for all Qatari banks. A significant further weakening in DB's asset quality, which put pressure on profitability and capital, would put downward pressure on the VR. In addition, a significant expansion of operations into lower-rated operating environments could also be negative for the VR.

Upside is unlikely in the current challenging operating environment and given pressures on the bank's asset quality, profitability and core capital.

The rating actions are as follows:

Doha Bank Q.P.S.C.

Long-Term IDR: affirmed at 'A'; Stable Outlook

Short-Term IDR: affirmed at 'F1'

Viability Rating: affirmed at 'bb+'

Support Rating: affirmed at '1'

Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'A'

Doha Finance Ltd

EMTN programme senior unsecured notes programme at 'A'/'F1'

Contact:

Primary Analyst

Redmond Ramsdale

Senior Director

+44 20 3530 1836

Fitch Ratings Limited

30 North Colonnade

London E14 5GN

Secondary Analyst

Huseyin Sevinc

Associate Director

+44 20 3530 1027

Committee Chairperson

Artur Szeski

Senior Director

+48 22 338 6292

Media Relations: Louisa Williams, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 2452, Email: louisa.williams@fitchratings.com.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria

Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044408

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/dodd-frank-disclosure/10066620

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10066620#solicitation

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM . PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory ), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.