|12 December, 2019

Fitch downgrades Lebanese banks to 'RD'

Fitch downgraded Bank Audi and Byblos Bank Long- and Short-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) to 'RD' (Restricted Default) from 'CCC-' and 'C' respectively.

Image used for illustrative purpose. Traders are seen busy working in BEMO Bank's dealing room before the end of Beirut's stock exchange trading session in Beirut, Lebanon in this April 3, 2006 file photo.

Image used for illustrative purpose. Traders are seen busy working in BEMO Bank's dealing room before the end of Beirut's stock exchange trading session in Beirut, Lebanon in this April 3, 2006 file photo.

REUTERS/Jamal Saidi
(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

Fitch Ratings-Dubai-December 12:

Fitch Ratings has downgraded Lebanon-based Bank Audi SAL's (Audi) and Byblos Bank SAL's (Byblos) Long- and Short-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) to 'RD' (Restricted Default) from 'CCC-' and 'C' respectively. Fitch has also downgraded the banks' Viability Ratings (VR) to 'f' from 'ccc-' and removed them from Rating Watch Negative (RWN). A full list of the rating actions is detailed below.

The rating action follows recently adopted measures by the Banque du Liban (BdL; Lebanese central bank), which introduced certain restrictions for banks' operations in foreign currency (FC), including for payments on customer deposits. These measures indicate increasing funding and currency stress in the country and are undertaken by BDL to limit pressures on the country's currency reserves and banking sector.

Key Rating Drivers

IDRs

The downgrade of both banks' IDRs reflect the regulatory intervention into banking-sector deposits, which impedes the banks' ability to service their contractual obligations in FC in full compliance with their original terms. The new regulatory measures, which require banks to pay in local currency (LC) half of the interest due on their FC customer deposits, in our view, represent a material reduction in terms compared with the original contractual terms of banks' financial obligations and meet Fitch's definition of a restricted default. These measures are announced to be in place for six months; however, we expect them to be renewed given the pressure on BdL's FC reserves and the lack of FC inflows from non-resident depositors.

To limit the ongoing deposit withdrawals, the Lebanese banks association set US dollar cash withdrawal limit of USD1,000/week with some banks applying tighter limits due to increasing FC-liquidity pressures.

VRs

The downgrades of the banks' VRs to 'f' reflect Fitch's view that banks have failed and would have defaulted had capital controls not been imposed given the high appetite for deposit withdrawals and lack of confidence in the banking system.

Banks' access to FC in the market is highly stretched and the banks' FC-liquidity management remains largely dependent on the ability of BdL to meet its FC obligations to commercial banks, which is becoming significantly constrained with the ongoing decline in its own FC reserves. Fitch expects FC reserves to decline to USD28 billion at end-2019 (down USD4 billion in 2019), and will continue to be eroded in 2020, given large external financing needs and current account deficit. We see an increasing risk that access to banks' assets with BdL, which represent more than 60% of sector banks' FC assets could become restricted at times of stress.

Exposures to BdL (placements and certificates of deposit (CDs)) represented a substantial 47% and 52% of Audi's and Byblos's balance sheets respectively at end-1H19 (7.4x and 9.1x of Audi's and Byblos's Fitch Core Capital respectively). As per the recent regulatory amendments, half of the interest paid by BdL on US dollar CDs and banks' US dollars placements at BdL will be in LC, which further restrains banks' FC liquidity and debt service capacity.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

The affirmation of the banks' '5' Support Ratings and the Support Rating Floors (SRF) of 'No Floor' reflects Fitch's view of the significantly constrained sovereign's ability to support banks, in particular in FC, as indicated by the low sovereign rating of 'CCC'.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRs and VRs

The ratings are unlikely to be upgraded until Fitch believes the banks are no longer defaulting, capital controls are materially eased and confidence is restored in the banking system, as evidenced by a return of strong FC inflows from non-resident depositors and investors, easing pressure on the banks' FC liquidity. In case of any upgrade we expect the ratings to be closely linked to those of Lebanon's sovereign 'CCC' rating, given the banks' large exposure to BdL and the Lebanese sovereign, and also capturing other weaknesses in the credit profiles and performance challenges that domestic banks are facing.

SUPPORT RATINGS AND SRFS

An upgrade of the Support Rating and an upward revision of SRF would be contingent on a positive change in the sovereign's ability to support domestic banks, most likely through a multi-notch sovereign upgrade. However, Fitch does not currently expect this.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entities, either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being managed by the entities. For more information on our ESG Relevance Scores, visit

Bank Audi S.A.L.; Long Term Issuer Default Rating; Downgrade; RD; RW: Off

; Short Term Issuer Default Rating; Downgrade; RD; RW: Off

; Viability Rating; Downgrade; f; RW: Off

; Support Rating; Affirmed; 5

; Support Rating Floor; Affirmed; NF

Byblos Bank S.A.L.; Long Term Issuer Default Rating; Downgrade; RD; RW: Off

; Short Term Issuer Default Rating; Downgrade; RD; RW: Off

; Viability Rating; Downgrade; f; RW: Off

; Support Rating; Affirmed; 5

; Support Rating Floor; Affirmed; NF

Contacts:

Primary Rating Analyst

Zeinab Abdalla,

Director

+971 4 424 1210

Fitch Ratings Ltd

Al Thuraya Tower 1, Office 1805 & 1806, Dubai Media City, PO Box 502030

Dubai

Secondary Rating Analyst

Gilbert Hobeika,

Associate Director

+971 4 424 1214

Committee Chairperson

Olga Ignatieva,

Senior Director

+7 495 956 6906

Media Relations: Louisa Williams, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 2452, Email: louisa.williams@thefitchgroup.com.

Additional information is available on

Applicable Criteria

Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)

Short-Term Ratings Criteria (pub. 02 May 2019)

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

Solicitation Status

Endorsement Policy

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT . PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see ), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

More From Business