Last week, the UK and India signed the Migration and Mobility Partnership, an agreement that will make it easier for their young citizens to study, work and live in each other’s country for up to two years. Realistically, most of the traffic will be one way, which makes the partnership look like a generous move by the British.
In fact, it is steeped in self-interest. It will be Britain that reaps the benefits of attracting India’s best and brightest, firstly through fat education fees and later in the taxes those highly qualified, high-earning professionals will pay when they decide to remain in the UK.
Certainly, the Indian government is not blameless. Poor planning and a failure not only to anticipate the current second wave of the virus but also to encourage it, by allowing large political rallies and religious gatherings to go ahead, have brought the country to this catastrophe.
Now, as suffering victims queue helplessly outside overwhelmed hospitals, the government’s decision to obey the letter of international contract law and allow vast quantities of vaccine to leave the country looks questionable, to say the least.
But what India and so many other countries need now is generous help from those nations that are sitting on stockpiles of vaccines for which they have no immediate need. Britain, for example, has more than 100 million doses in stock — not because it needs them for administering first, or even second, jabs but simply in case booster shots become necessary at some point.
Despite an assurance by Health Secretary Matt Hancock that the UK would “stand side by side” with India in its “harrowing” hour of need, it has been clear that any assistance will not go beyond the few surplus ventilators and oxygen cylinders that have been sent out.
As for vaccines, Britain has not sent a single dose to India. On that score, said Hancock, Britain has already done its bit by providing the technology and expertise that developed the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Set against that reality, his reassurances of support sound hollow indeed.
Of course, Britain is not the only country that is talking the talk but not walking the walk. Despite all the efforts by the World Health Organization (WHO) to get the world’s wealthy nations to collaborate on vaccinating everyone, rather than only their own people, the imbalance between vaccine haves and have-nots is as striking as it is distasteful.
As the world’s vaccinated wealthier populations are able to again begin socializing and planning summer holidays, the number of daily new infections around the world has hit a record high — more than doubling since the beginning of March. On May 6, the WHO recorded 846,537 new cases, almost half of which were in India.
Few, surely, could disagree with Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s COVID-19 technical lead, who last week described the hoarding of vaccine doses by wealthy countries as a “moral outrage.”
Hopes were raised last week when the US announced it would back a World Trade Organization (WTO) initiative to temporarily lift patent protections for coronavirus vaccines in a bid to increase global production. But this requires a WTO consensus, and on May 6 Germany became the first country to oppose it, which means it is now unlikely to happen.
However, as the WHO continues to state repeatedly, none of us is safe until all of us are safe. As countries begin to reopen, aircraft will return to the skies in large, uncontrollable numbers. The coronavirus will once again be free to conquer the world, just as it did in March 2020 thanks to the fateful delay in restricting air travel and tightening border controls.
Thanks to India’s hopelessly inadequate vaccination program, a novel strain might be brewing there even now, ready to find its way to Britain via an asymptomatic student who takes advantage of the Migration and Mobility Partnership to study in the UK.
If it does, Britain might yet come to regret its shortsighted lack of generosity and learn, in the harshest way, that in the modern, interconnected world isolationism is impossible and true safety can be found only in international collaboration.
• Jonathan Gornall is a British journalist, formerly with The Times, who has lived and worked in the Middle East and is now based in the UK. Copyright: Syndication Bureau
Copyright: Arab News © 2021 All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Disclaimer: The content of this article is syndicated or provided to this website from an external third party provider. We are not responsible for, and do not control, such external websites, entities, applications or media publishers. The body of the text is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither we nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this article. Read our full disclaimer policy here
© Arab News 2021