• Index compares 43 retirement income systems, covering two-thirds of world’s population

Dubai, UAE – Mercer released the results of its 13th Annual Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index (MCGPI) which for the first time included the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The UAE’s retirement income system ranked 22nd among countries with long-standing pension systems such as United States of America, France and Spain. Globally, Iceland ranked number one followed by the Netherlands, while Thailand ranked last.

The MCGPI is a comprehensive study of global pension systems, accounting for two-thirds (65 per cent) of the world’s population. It benchmarks retirement income systems around the world highlighting some shortcomings in each system and suggests possible areas of reform that would provide more adequate and sustainable retirement benefits. The UAE system scored among global peers across three key areas of focus: adequacy, sustainability and integrity.

Within the UAE, pensions of Emiratis are governed by different agencies such as the Abu Dhabi Pension Fund (ADPF), Sharjah Social Security Fund (SSSF) and the General Pensions and Social Security Authority (GPSSA). The UAE’s pension adequacy rankings are supported by country’s generous retirement benefits, which ensure a continued income to sustain a good quality of life with a suitable minimum pension relative to earnings.

The UAE also scored well in terms of sustainability given its high labor force participation rate, especially for individuals over the age of 55. In fact, the retirement income system in the UAE enacts a sound structure to develop a funded pension system for Emiratis with both the public and private sector setting aside mandatory contributions during an employee’s tenure. Moreover, the robust governance structure around the national pension system in the UAE afforded it a strong ranking in terms of integrity.

Commenting on the results, Hazem Abdel-Rahman, Mercer's Retirement Business Leader for the Middle East, stated: “The UAE has a robust pension system in place for Emiratis, which is highlighted by its entry into our annual MCGPI survey ranking alongside many peers that have more established systems. It is notable that the UAE’s retirement benefits are well governed and provide a sufficient income to pension recipients. With that said, as life expectancy continues to rise, the UAE may benefit from increasing the retirement age; this is a step many countries have already taken to ensure the ability to provide for aging and future generations. Furthermore, introducing private pension plans as a complementary retirement program will reduce the pressure on the social security programs in the country and enhance the overall retirement income.”

While the UAE ranks alongside global peers the report has identified a few key areas that require development in the country’s pension system, including introducing a minimum access age to an individual’s retirement benefit, and increasing the state pension age in response to the country’s life expectancy.

“The UAE claiming a place in the top 22 ranking globally testifies the UAE Government’s commitment to ensuring long-term financial planning and well-being for its citizens,” said William Tohme, CFA, Senior Regional Head of Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) at CFA Institute. “The concerted efforts by the UAE Government over the past few years demonstrate a robust pension system in place in the country which is underpinned by strong governance and international best practices. We are confident that the recently launched ‘UAE Next 50’ initiative, premised on socio-economic transformation, will further act as a catalyst for pension reforms both in public and private sectors. In order for the UAE to improve they need to implement reforms and more compensation measures to incentivise its pension system to balance its aging and retirement ratio. At CFA Institute, we look forward to continue our engagement and collaboration with policymakers and key stakeholders representing the UAE Inc.”

By the numbers

The UAE had an overall index score of 59.6, ranking 22nd on the list. The Index uses a weighted average of the sub-indices of adequacy, sustainability and integrity, and the country demonstrated positive results across all.

The country scored 59.7 in adequacy, due to the generous retirement benefits with suitable minimum pensions relative to earnings. Driven by the labor force participation rate, especially for individuals over the age of 55, the country scored 50.2 in sustainability. The score in this sub-index was bolstered by the sound structure of a funded pension system with mandatory contributions set aside for retirement benefits. The country scored the highest, 72.6, in integrity, owing to the strong governance structure around the pension system. 

Global Results

Globally, Iceland had the highest overall index value (84.2), closely followed by the Netherlands (83.5). Thailand had the lowest index value (40.6). For each sub-index, the systems with the highest values were Iceland for adequacy (82.7), Iceland for sustainability (84.6) and Finland for integrity (93.1). The systems with the lowest values across the sub-indices were India for adequacy (33.5), Italy for sustainability (21.3) and the Philippines for integrity (35.0).

In comparison to 2020, China and the UK showed the most improvement as a result of significant pension reform, which improved outcomes for individuals and pension regulation.

>

2021 Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index

-Ends-

About the Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index

The Global Pension Index benchmarks retirement income systems around the world highlighting some shortcomings in each system and suggests possible areas of reform that would provide more adequate and sustainable retirement benefits.

The Global Pension Index is a collaborative research project sponsored by CFA Institute, the global association of investment professionals, in collaboration with the Monash Centre for Financial Studies (MCFS), part of Monash Business School at Monash University, and Mercer, a global leader in redefining the world of work and reshaping retirement and investment outcomes.

This year, the Global Pension Index compares 43 retirement income systems across the globe and covers two-thirds (65 per cent) of the world’s population. The 2021 Global Pension Index includes four new systems – Iceland, Taiwan, UAE and Uruguay.

The Global Pension Index uses the weighted average of the sub-indices of adequacy, sustainability and integrity to measure each retirement system against more than 50 indicators.

About Mercer

Mercer believes in building brighter futures by redefining the world of work, reshaping retirement and investment outcomes, and unlocking real health and well-being. Mercer’s approximately 25,000 employees are based in 43 countries and the firm operates in 130 countries. Mercer is a business of Marsh McLennan (NYSE: MMC), the world’s leading professional services firm in the areas of risk, strategy and people, with 78,000 colleagues and annual revenue of over $18 billion. Through its market-leading businesses including Marsh, Guy Carpenter and Oliver Wyman, Marsh McLennan helps clients navigate an increasingly dynamic and complex environment. For more information, visit www.mercer.com  Follow Mercer on Twitter @Mercer. 

About CFA Institute

CFA Institute is the global association of investment professionals that sets the standard for professional excellence and credentials. The organization is a champion of ethical behaviour in investment markets and a respected source of knowledge in the global financial community. Our aim is to create an environment where investors’ interests come first, markets function at their best, and economies grow. There are more than 175,000 CFA® charterholders worldwide in more than160 markets. CFA Institute has nine offices worldwide and there are 160 local member societies. For more information, visit www.cfainstitute.org or follow us on Twitter at @CFAInstitute and on Linkedin and Twitter at @CFAInstitute. 

About the Monash Centre for Financial Studies (MCFS)

A research centre based within Monash University's Monash Business School, Australia, the MCFS aims to bring academic rigour into researching issues of practical relevance to the financial industry. Additionally, through its engagement programs, it facilitates two-way exchange of knowledge between academics and practitioners. The Centre’s developing research agenda is broad but has a current concentration on issues relevant to the asset management industry, including retirement savings, sustainable finance and technological disruption. 

Contact:
Ahmed Moharram       
+966 547728040
Ahmed.moharram@mercer.com 

Send us your press releases to pressrelease.zawya@refinitiv.com

© Press Release 2021

Disclaimer: The contents of this press release was provided from an external third party provider. This website is not responsible for, and does not control, such external content. This content is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither this website nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this press release.

The press release is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither this website nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors or inaccuracies in the content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the information within this article is at your sole risk.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, this website, its parent company, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and the respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors will not be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, including without limitation, lost profits, lost savings and lost revenues, whether in negligence, tort, contract or any other theory of liability, even if the parties have been advised of the possibility or could have foreseen any such damages.