Forgot your password
Support: +971 4 3635663  |  Email us  |  Send us your feedback
Loading Loading ...
Loading ...
 
» Back to Sukuk Home
 
 
01 Feb 2012
 

The 99%, money mechanics and Islamic finance

 
 
01 February 2012
This year, the World Economic Forum in Davos had a unique subtitle: The Great Transformation: Shaping New Models.  Global corporate leaders, bankers, politicians, policymakers, and a good number of billionaires discussed the challenges to a system that defines their wealth, their roles, and their future.

Meanwhile, outside, camped in igloos, were the critics of the system, the Occupy WEF movement. The 99% were protesting in the cold, seemingly unaware that the culprit behind our current predicament is not the so called 1%, but a thought, held by billions.

The inability to imagine a smooth and peaceful resolution to the world's economic and monetary  challenges is linked to the deeply entrenched belief in scarcity. Indeed, scarcity is perceived as an ingredient of value. Thanks to a myopic science - mainstream economics - scarcity has managed to become more central in our worldview than the power of creative imagination. Instead of defining itself as the science that seeks to perfect and improve the tools and frameworks of prosperity, economics is defined as the science that studies the optimal allocation of scarce resources.

Across the world, the policy assumptions used to address the current crisis are based on a monetary architecture that is deeply flawed. It is so seriously flawed that the shortcomings in our architecture evoke the limitations we used to impose on ourselves when we believed without evidence that the Earth was flat. Today, our belief in the debt-based monetary architecture is as limiting and as restrictive. As such, the key change we need is a change in our thinking and beliefs in what is possible.

Despite and in spite of its limitations and pains, this system is being bailed out with more debts, and it is being sustained by more confusion and more credit. While banks, governments, and central banks find a way to print more debt/money for themselves, the rest must suffer through austerity measures.

The challenge for Islamic finance is to choose to diverge, to deviate, and be different. We have at our disposal principles that can allow us to build a better system. These principles, whether we call them Islamic or Buddhist, are useful and relevant. Indeed, they can help advanced economies engineer a more beneficial and more optimal solution to the crisis. They can help reform the global financial architecture in a way that can increase aggregate utility and overall productivity. They can help us reform and improve money mechanics, which is the ultimate source of our current woes.

The most daunting global policy paradox today is the simultaneous and parallel implementation of quantitative easing and austerity measures. The former is a pure invention and creation of money, the latter is a contraction in spending based on the premise that money is not as available as it was previously. The parallel adoption of these policies has fuelled an awareness of a serious imbalance.

An informed public is observing how banks are being bailed out and provided with fresh reserves or fresh loans, while hard working people are being penalized by the same banks for defaulting on their loans or mortgages. This is true everywhere, in the US, UK, Europe and the Islamic world. There is public discontent everywhere, and it is being aggravated by a lack of policy imagination across the board. 

While central banks are inventing new money, and helping out the banks from default, they are also allowing banks to foreclose someone's home because the concerned family is unable to pay its dues. This is most disturbing  as a practice when one is aware of the mechanics behind money and credit creation. Furthermore, and adding to the absurdity and irony of the situation, the key entities responsible for the current crisis are not families and individuals, but banks, central banks, and governments.

What is a sovereign debt crisis when the state is the creator of money? How absurd is this charade, and how tragic is this farce? We are the creators of money, the authors of the rules that govern it, and the builders of budgets that spend it, we are the inventors of central banks and governments, of banks and debt markets, we do as we please.

Islamic finance principles can help transform money mechanics in a way that preserves the value of money, but diversifies the instruments used to create and inject it. I have proposed such a transformation in other essays, where I have proposed the concept of equity-like monetization, and a product that can do the job just fine, i.e., Public Capitalization Notes (PCNs).

Public Capitalization Notes are profit sharing project-based real activity enhancing instruments. If such instruments were to be used for money injection, we could turn the page on this crisis in a relatively very short period of time.

PCNs, while channeling funding to where it is most needed, facilitate job creation, employment, income, deposits, and real activity. Public Capitalization Notes allow the existing system: 1) to survive through a bypass of its own mechanisms, and 2) to balance the inadequacies of a purely debt-based model.

Instead of backing money with Public Debt, which is untenable without ever increasing debt levels, we could also back it with Public Investments, i.e., wealth. Indeed, to resolve the current crisis effectively and fundamentally, the debt-based monetary architecture must be complemented with a channel of money creation that does not add more debt to the system and creates income without depending on bank credit.

PCNs are Islamic instruments in nature, and allow us to transform a debt-based money mechanics in a way where injection or creation of money is not synonymous or necessarily linked to debt or credit creation. Public Capitalization Notes are wealth-based instruments that involve a joint and coordinated investment by central banks and governments into the socioeconomic fabric of a country. We owe this to ourselves, and we owe it debt free. Unless, of course, we believe in scarcity.

The 99% need a better and fairer monetary architecture and Islamic finance principles can help. The Islamic finance industry must reach out to fulfill a universal role, and contribute to the betterment of a system that seems to be quite indifferent to ethnic, racial, religious, and national differentiations. In embracing its Universal destiny, Islamic finance must go beyond the Shariah, beyond the Islamic, and embrace a global urgency to ensure a better tomorrow for a planet in crisis. After all, a significant chunk of the 99% are in the Islamic world, and money creation in the Islamic world follows and emulates conventional methodology.

Dr. Armen V. Papazian is a financial economist, consultant, speaker and founding CEO of Keipr. He is a former head of Islamic finance at UBS, a former MD for innovation and development at DIFX - Nasdaq Dubai, and a former honorary fellow of the Cambridge Judge Business School, UK. He earned his PhD in financial economics at the University of Cambridge, King's College, Cambridge, UK.

© Zawya 2012

 
x DISCLAIMER

Zawya is a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties and subscribers. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed or made available by those third parties, including information providers, subscribers or other users of the Service, are those of the respective author(s) or distributor(s) and not of the Company. The Company neither endorses nor is responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any opinion, advice or statement made on the Service by anyone other than authorized Service employee spokespersons while acting in their official capacities. The Company is not responsible for any infringement of intellectual property rights or breach of any applicable law or regulation, including regulation in relation to financial services or the distribution of financial products, defamation, data protection, telecommunications (including regulations relating to excessive use, spamming or other abusive activities) or obscene, offensive or illegal content). Under no circumstances will the Company be liable for any loss or damage caused by a member's reliance on information obtained through the Service. It is the responsibility of member to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content available through the Service. Please seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding the evaluation of any specific information, opinion, advice or other content.

Read the full Member Agreement
http://www.zawya.com/legal/NewsLetter.cfm?name=disclaimer
 
Access to this article is subject to specific terms and condition.
 
 

Post a Comment

 
  • Comment Title (optional)
  • Express your views or tell us more about this article
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Email Address
  • Company Name (optional)
Leave this field empty
 
 
Zawya Comment Policy
 
  1. Zawya encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You agree that when you add content to this discussion your comments will not:
    1.1   Contain any material which is libelous or defamatory of any person, is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory or causes damage to the reputation of any person or organisation.
    1.2   Promote sexually explicit material, violence, discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age or any illegal activity.
    1.3   Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence.
    1.4   Be threatening, abuse or invade another's privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
    1.5   Be used to impersonate any person, to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person, or be likely to deceive any person.
    1.6   Give the impression that they represent Zawya.
    1.7   Advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.
  2. The content posted on www.zawya.com is created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of Zawya. Zawya reserves the right to review all comments prior to posting and edit or delete any contribution, but Zawya is not responsible for and can not be held liable for any content posted by members of the public on www.zawya.com.
  3. Zawya is not responsible for the availability or content of any third party sites that are accessible through www.zawya.com. Any links to third party websites from www.zawya.com do not amount to any endorsement of that site by Zawya and any use of that site by you is at your own risk.
  4. By submitting your comment, you hereby give Zawya the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comments worldwide, in perpetuity.
 
 
Items Related to Story

Sukuk Monitor

 
 
Comprehensive database tracking major Sukuk issued internationally.
 
 

 
Panel