Nov 23 2010 |
more articles from
|
Court upholds ruling annulling Madinaty land contract
CAIRO: A court upheld a ruling on Tuesday that invalidates the sale of state land to Talaat Mostafa Group for the developer's Madinaty project, and said that the government must put the land up for public auction.The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the challenge presented by the Ministry of Housing's New Urban Communities Authority (NUCA) and TMG on a previous court ruling to invalidate the contract of state land sales for the $3 billion Madinaty project.
Hamdy El-Fakharany, who filed the initial case against Madinaty and state actors, says that the court's decision leaves no more room for the government to go around the ruling.
Egypt's Cabinet had decided to scrap the original deal and reallocate the land directly to TMG with the same terms under its right to act in the national interest, Reuters reported. The cabinet has said it would pass legislation to end ambiguity about land sales after a parliamentary vote on Sunday.
El-Fakharany denounced the state's attempts to circumvent the verdict by amending the contract with TMG , adding that Tuesday's verdict makes it illegal for the government to go through with the new contracts and that the city council refuses this solution.
The only acceptable action by the state now is to annul the contract with TMG and sell the land in a public auction, he said, adding that if the land is sold in public auction, that would equal around LE 40,000 for every Egyptian. "Why does the government insist on giving this money to only one person or company?"
Acitivst Karima El-Hefnawy attended the court ruling session and said that the verdict serves the Egyptian people.
"If the verdict is executed, the Egyptian people will recover billions of dollars that were robbed by the owners of these companies who bought the land at extremely cheap prices," she said. "If we had a government that cares about its people, this money would be channeled into services for the people like health, education, housing."
El-Hefnawy said the verdict would be a precedent for numerous similar contracts. Already, Palm Hills Development faces similar legal action for land bought directly from the state.
"This verdict gives us hope that the land of Palm Hills and other land that was sold based on corrupted direct sales rather than public auction at fractions of their real prices could be restored to the Egyptian people and resold at their actual prices," she said.
A similar case raised against PHD, which also demands the annulment of a state land sales contract with Egyptian developer, was discussed in Tuesday's court hearing but adjourned to Dec. 14.
PHD's attorneys presented a demand to the judge to transfer the case to another court based on their claim that the case does not fall under the jurisdiction of this court and on the Madinaty verdict, which they interpreted as biased.
"The court is not neutral-minded about this issue and the verdict is pre-determined," PHD's attorneys told the judge.
El-Hefnawy, on the other had, said that the firm's attorneys made this demand fearing the same fate as the Madinaty verdict.
"We are against this demand because each case has its own circumstances and the judges have the right to rule in similar cases because we do not question the integrity of the judicial system," she said.
Supporters of Hamdy El-Fakharany organized a protest outside city council after the verdict, protesting the direct sales of state land to investors at prices considerably lower than market value.
Heba Afify
© Daily News Egypt 2010
Zawya Comment Policy
-
Zawya encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You agree that when you add content to this discussion your comments will not:
1.1 Contain any material which is libelous or defamatory of any person, is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory or causes damage to the reputation of any person or organisation.
1.2 Promote sexually explicit material, violence, discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age or any illegal activity.
1.3 Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence.
1.4 Be threatening, abuse or invade another's privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
1.5 Be used to impersonate any person, to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person, or be likely to deceive any person.
1.6 Give the impression that they represent Zawya.
1.7 Advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse. - The content posted on www.zawya.com is created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of Zawya. Zawya reserves the right to review all comments prior to posting and edit or delete any contribution, but Zawya is not responsible for and can not be held liable for any content posted by members of the public on www.zawya.com.
- Zawya is not responsible for the availability or content of any third party sites that are accessible through www.zawya.com. Any links to third party websites from www.zawya.com do not amount to any endorsement of that site by Zawya and any use of that site by you is at your own risk.
- By submitting your comment, you hereby give Zawya the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comments worldwide, in perpetuity.
Copyright © 2012 Zawya Ltd. All rights reserved. |
provided by www.zawya.com |
Post Your Comment