FREE Services | Support: +971 4 3635663 | Email us
» Sat, Aug 30, 2008, 00:08 GMT
Send us your feedback
Feedback
Sponsored by   Mudabala
Middle East Business Information
 
Loading Loading ...
Membership = requires subscription

Big oil, big problem

breakingviews.com
 
 
24 September 2007
Big oil: Big Oil has a big problem. It may not be apparent from the profits energy companies are churning out. But the industry's future depends on its ability to rove the earth in search of new reservoirs of oil and gas.

Yet as energy resources grow scarcer, governments are restricting western drillers' access to their fields. They're fostering their own champions, many of whom are flush with capital, have learned from the majors over the years and can easily hire drilling expertise from service firms like SchlumbergerSchlumbergerLoading....

There at least three logical responses by the oil majors to the rise of National Oil Companies (NOCs). The first, already underway, is to invest in countries where they're unlikely to see assets expropriated. The second is to consider buying service firms themselves. Lastly, they could seek mega-mergers, along the lines of an ExxonExxonLoading...-ChevronChevronLoading... or BPBPLoading...-ShellShellLoading..., to counter the increasing heft of the NOCs.

None of this will happen overnight, of course. But there are already signs of a flight to friendlier climates by western producers. It's easy to see why. Consider some the past month's developments: Algeria booted Spain's RepsolRepsolLoading... out of a major project; Kazakhstan stepped up the pressure on Italy's Eni in its huge Caspian find; and ExxonMobilExxonMobilLoading... took its fight to the courts against Hugo Chavez's decision to nationalise assets in Venezuela.

That's why ConocoPhillipsConocoPhillipsLoading..., ShellShellLoading... and others are increasing investments in countries like the US and Canada. But this presents complications of its own. Deep in the Gulf of Mexico or Alberta's oil sands it's far more difficult, and costly, to extract energy. This has two consequences: it reduces profits for the majors and it accelerates the transfer of treasure and technology to the oil service providers.

What's wrong with that? After all, it's efficient to outsource the extraction of natural resources to these firms, leaving the valuable task of finding new gushers to the exploration companies. The problem is that as service firms get better at what they do, it becomes easier for the national oil groups to view them as better partners than Big Oil.

In the past, the majors were valued for their capital, their ability to locate new reserves and their project management skills. But think of it. A country like Algeria has seen its coffers fill with petrodollars in recent years - it doesn't need capital. And its petroleum engineers have learned project management skills by working closely with the majors.

So if it can hire SchlumbergerSchlumbergerLoading... to do the dirty work to exploit the country's reserves, why pay ExxonExxonLoading... or RepsolRepsolLoading... a chunk of future royalties? This becomes especially critical as service companies have increased their edge. In recent years, they've filed twice as many technology patents as the oil majors, according to Weatherford, a service firm.

That's why nearly all the majors have discussed acquiring service providers. They haven't pulled the trigger, though, for good reasons. First, there's price: SchlumbergerSchlumbergerLoading... trades at 21 times 2008 profit estimates, compared to 14 times for ExxonExxonLoading.... Furthermore, the worry is that if ExxonExxonLoading... owned SchlumbergerSchlumbergerLoading..., most of ExxonExxonLoading...'s rivals would cease to do business with the Franco-American service provider.

That leaves the majors with a final option: mega-mergers. With a $510bn market cap, ExxonExxonLoading...'s no wimp. But if it bought $200bn ChevronChevronLoading... it would create an energy champion on the scale of a Gazprom or Saudi AramcoSaudi AramcoLoading.... It would also create tons of value. If it extracted synergies from ChevronChevronLoading... in line with the 2.5% of costs that it squeezed from Mobil, there would be up to $12bn of savings. After taxes, these could be worth $70bn to shareholders today. A BPBPLoading...-ShellShellLoading... combination would offer similarly juicy cuts.

Sure, there would be antitrust issues, particularly in the refining business. And with oil prices at $80 a barrel, energy executives may not feel pressure to move anytime soon. But as energy resources dwindle and the world gets smaller for western producers, it gets easier to see a day when Big Oil gets a lot bigger.

Author: Rob Cox and Cyrus Sanati
Email: rob.cox@breakingviews.com

For more incisive commentary, click to take a free trial of breakingviews.com, the financial commentary service.

© breakingviews.com 2007

 
 
 
Community Comments (0) - Comment on this article
The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect Zawya. Read our Comment Policy.
 
 
 
Loading ...
 
Loading ...
Zawya Comment Policy:
 
  1. Zawya encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You agree that when you add content to this discussion your comments will not:
    1.1   Contain any material which is libelous or defamatory of any person, is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory or causes damage to the reputation of any person or organisation.
    1.2   Promote sexually explicit material, violence, discrimination based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age or any illegal activity.
    1.3   Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party, such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence.
    1.4   Be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
    1.5   Be used to impersonate any person, to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person, or be likely to deceive any person.
    1.6   Give the impression that they represent Zawya.
    1.7   Advocate, promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse.
  2. The content posted on www.zawya.com is created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of Zawya. Zawya reserves the right to review all comments prior to posting and edit or delete any contribution, but Zawya is not responsible for and can not be held liable for any content posted by members of the public on www.zawya.com.
  3. Zawya is not responsible for the availability or content of any third party sites that are accessible through www.zawya.com. Any links to third party websites from www.zawya.com do not amount to any endorsement of that site by Zawya and any use of that site by you is at your own risk.
  4. By submitting your comment, you hereby give Zawya the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comments worldwide, in perpetuity.
 
 
 
Community Buzz

Stories

Loading Loading...
 

Companies

Loading Loading...
 

Projects

Loading Loading...
 

Blogs

Loading Loading...
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Quote data provided by © TickerChart
Site is optimised for viewing at 1024 x 768 with Internet Explorer v6 and Firefox v1.5 and above.
Copyright © 2008 ABQ Zawya Ltd. All rights reserved. Please read our Membership Agreement